Tag: Consumers

Reports

Food industry communication with next generation consumers: knowledge, engagement, empowerment, food values

Published:

29/12/2021

Authors:

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir Matís and HÍ, Berglind Lilja Guðlaugsdóttir HÍ, Anna Sigríður Ólafsdóttir HÍ, Eva Margrét Jónudóttir Matís, Þóra Valsdóttir Matís and Guðjón Þorkelsson Matís

Supported by:

EIT Food

Contact

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Project Manager

kolbrun.sveinsdottir@matis.is

People are increasingly moving away from the primary production of food, and the connection to raw materials and their processing is often unclear. Young people are the consumers of the future. Their attitude and trust in food is therefore of great importance to food manufacturers. The needs and values of young people are not necessarily the same as those of older people. The goal of the WeValueFood project was to find ways to increase the understanding and knowledge of young people so that they understand the values and values of food and become more aware of food in a wider context.

Three workshops were organized by Matís, where university students and the Icelandic food industry were brought together. The workshops focused on current communication patterns and the industry's provision of information to consumers, and the goal was to support the food industry's communication with consumers of the future. Various food companies and stakeholders came to the workshops and worked with young consumers to define food values and have a conversation about communication channels. Emphasis was placed on increasing interest and knowledge of food in order to promote the following generations to make rational and informed decisions in their food choices. The three workshops took place online in the fall of 2020: 1) With university students – to explore their food values and opinion on current food industry communication channels, 2) With participants from the food industry – to explore how they experience the next generation of consumers and how the food industry can support education/knowledge and participation in food-related issues and 3) With university students and participants from the food industry – to introduce food industry ideas and communication channels, and explore student responses.

The students placed great emphasis on environmental impact, as transparency and honesty are key factors for a positive image and trust in food producers. Young people want to know more about how food is produced and, no less, what is involved in the production process. They wanted to see more about how food is produced in Iceland, either on social media, on the websites of food companies or through food labels. What young people called for included verified information on everything from origin to cooking and storage instructions. Emphasis was placed on the fact that the information had to be confirmed by neutral parties such as scientists. Participants from the food industry were generally aware of the needs of young people in terms of information and means of communication, but often had difficulty meeting these needs due to costs and time. The food industry called for a partnership with the authorities to address the knowledge and education needs of young people to ensure adequate and scientifically proven information is available to all. One of the solutions proposed by the industry participants could easily respond to the needs of young people for specific food knowledge, which at the same time could contribute to increased interest and participation of young people. This solution involved a food science website, which would be managed by independent bodies, such as universities, to share scientifically proven information without conflicts of interest. The workshops created an interesting conversation between the students and the food producer, which provided important insights for both consumers and the food industry. It is important to follow the workshops and strengthen the dialogue and flow of information between consumers and producers in order to meet the needs of the consumers of the future.

WeValueFood was funded by the European Union through EIT Food. In addition to Matís and the University of Iceland, the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and the IMDEA Food Institute in Spain, EUFIC in Belgium, Koppert in the Netherlands, the University of Cambridge and the University of Reading in the UK, the University of Helsinki in Finland, the University of Turin in Italy, the University of Warsaw in Poland and Flatev in Switzerland for the project. The project as a whole was led by the Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
_____
Food consumption trends have increased the gap between primary food production. The proximity to production of raw materials and food processing has become more unclear to many consumers. Young people are the consumers of the future. Their attitude towards food is therefore important to food producers. Their needs and values are not necessarily the same as those of older consumers. The aim of the WeValueFood project was to find ways to increase the understanding and strengthen young people's knowledge and understanding so that they better appreciate the values of food and become more aware of food in a wider context.

Three online workshops on food values of next generation consumers (NGCs) were carried out in Iceland in the autumn of 2020, by Matis in collaboration with the University of Iceland. The communication between university students of various study categories and food industry was explored within the three workshops: 1) With students – to assess their food values and opinions on the current food industry communication; 2) With industry participants – to understand how they perceive the NGCs and how they can help to educate and engage them with food; 3) With students and industry – to present industry's ideas of communication and receive student feedback on industries' communication strategies.

The students emphasized the environmental impact of foods, transparency, and honesty in communication for a positive image of and trust in food producers. They wanted to know more about how food is made, either on social media or food industry websites, or with food labels. Emphasis was placed on information about everything from origin and environmental labels to cooking and storage guidelines. Not less important, the information needed to be verified by a responsible independent third party, such as scientists. The food industry participants were generally aware of NGC's information needs and communication channels, but struggled to meet these needs, mainly due to cost and time. The food industry needs cooperation with authorities to educate the next generation on food related issues, to fulfill the NGC needs for knowledge, with scientifically valid and trustworthy information available for everyone. One of the idea pitches from the industry summarized the overall need for knowledge and communication, both for the food industry and NGC that could improve food involvement and engagement. The pitch was about a food science website, supervised by independent parties, such as universities, to provide fact-based, scientifically correct information, without any conflicts of interest.

WeValueFood, was supported by EU through EIT Food, was a two-year collaborative project between Matis, University of Iceland, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM-IMDEA) and IMDEA Food Institute in Spain, EUFIC in Belgium, Koppert in the Netherlands, University of Cambridge and University of Reading in England, University of Helsinki in Finland University of Turin in Italy, University of Warsaw in Poland and Flatev in Switzerland. The entire project was managed by the Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, North Ireland.

View report

Reports

Saltfish delicacies: Saltfish month

Published:

29/08/2024

Authors:

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Þóra Valsdóttir, Eva Margrét Jónudóttir

Supported by:

AG Fisk (Arbejdsgruppen for Fiskerisamarbejdet), NORA

Contact

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Project Manager

kolbrun.sveinsdottir@matis.is

To strengthen the position of saltfish, with its long tradition, history and connection to Nordic livelihoods, it is important to strengthen the entire value chain, from producers and retailers, to chefs and consumers. The aim of the project "Saltfish delicacies" is to develop new or improved ready-made dishes based on traditional saltfish, and 16 participants from Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands are involved. The group consists of experts in saltfish processing and quality, cooking, food production, media and the travel industry.

Following the project's workshop held in the fall of 2022, work continued with ideas for salted fish dishes and salted fish products in collaboration with Grím Kokk, Matís, Menntaskolin in Kópavogur, Icelandic salted fish producers, Klúbbs Matreiðslumestar and Íslandstofa, with the aim of promoting salted fish better with a focus on grocery stores.

Salted fish products and recipes for salted fish dishes were developed within the project and in collaboration with the Crown, the products were put on sale and recipes for salted fish dishes were published on the Crown's recipe page in March 2024. The results were then presented at the project's workshop in the Faroe Islands in May 2024. Both salted fish products and recipes were very positively received, and there are hopes that it will be possible to offer salted fish delicacies in Icelandic supermarkets permanently. It's an uphill battle, however, as the battle for grocery store shelf space is fierce, and it can be difficult for smaller producers to invest in finished salted fish in the quantities that have been available to them so far. It is necessary to increase flexibility and strengthen cooperation within the salted fish chain to pave the way for salted fish domestically, to revolutionize its image and reputation.

View report

Reports

Salted fish delicacies: What is salted fish? Workshop 2022

Published:

14/12/2022

Authors:

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Þóra Valsdóttir, Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Eva Margrét Jónudóttir, Sigurjón Arason

Supported by:

AG Fisk (Arbejdsgruppen for Fiskerisamarbejdet), NORA

Contact

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Project Manager

kolbrun.sveinsdottir@matis.is

To strengthen the position of saltfish, with its long tradition, history and connection to Nordic livelihoods, it is important to strengthen the entire value chain, from producers and retailers, to chefs and consumers. The aim of the project "Saltfish delicacies" is to develop new or improved ready-made dishes based on traditional saltfish, and 16 participants from Iceland, Norway and the Faroe Islands are involved. The group consists of experts in saltfish processing and quality, cooking, food production, media and the travel industry.   

This report describes the workshop "What is saltfish?" which was held in the house of the Menntaskólin in Kópavogur, September 28, 2022 in collaboration with Matís, the Menntaskólin in Kópavogur (MK), Grím Kokk, Klúbbs Matreiðslumeista and Icelandic saltfish producers. The goal of the workshop was to share knowledge from various sources, and look for ways to strengthen the position of salted fish in the domestic market, and about 40 people attended the workshop. Short presentations were given by Matís experts on the history, culture, effectiveness and dewatering of salted fish. Also about the knowledge and attitude of consumers towards salted fish and its consumption in Iceland. The sensory properties of salted fish were presented, and attendees had the opportunity to taste and compare two types of salted fish and two types of salted fish. MK culinary students then presented their ideas behind salted fish dishes, which were served on the table. After that, we worked in three groups, each of which discussed the following topics: "What is salted fish - can we call salted fish salted fish?", "How do we reach the young people?" and "How can the product range be increased?".

The results of the workshop showed that it is important to distinguish between what is truly salted fish on the one hand and salted fish on the other. Salted fish, usually lightly salted or overnight salted, does not have the same characteristics as salted fish, which is fish finished with salt and brine and then dry-salted even for weeks, which after dehydration gives this product unique properties such as a characteristic taste and firm texture. It seems that there are endless opportunities and opportunities for the saltfish. However, we need to pay better for the way of salted fish to the Icelandic market. Saltfish should really be to us Icelanders, on par with what Parma ham is to Italians, at least. To promote knowledge, respect and consumption of salted fish, it needs to be better known and made more visible, not least among younger age groups. What hinders chefs and producers of products is that it is often difficult to obtain fully prepared, properly watered salted fish domestically. Dewatering requires a problem, but often the facilities, time or knowledge are not available. We need to reach younger consumers and improve the reputation of salted fish in general. The name saltfish is not very appropriate, as it has a reference to salted fish and has a negative image due to its association with second class fish. Dehydrated salted fish should not be too salty. Perhaps finished, dehydrated saltfish should be called something other than saltfish.

View report

Reports

Consumer survey on salted fish

Published:

30/08/2019

Authors:

Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Supported by:

AG Fisk, AVS Research Fund

Contact

Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir

Sensory evaluation manager

adalheiduro@matis.is

Consumer survey on salted fish

There is a long tradition for processing salted fish in this country, but before that the salt was used primarily to extend the shelf life of the fish. Today, salted fish is considered a gourmet product that is very popular in many parts of the world, not least in Southern Europe, where the traditions and quality of Icelandic salted fish play a major role. Matís ran workshops with salted fish producers and chefs in April and May 2019. Their goal was, among other things, to assess the position of salted fish in the domestic market. It was stated that information was needed on Icelanders' views on salted fish in order to better assess the opportunities in Iceland. Based on the results of the workshops, an online survey was conducted with the aim of researching the image of salted fish products in the minds of Icelanders, general knowledge of salted fish and its history, and the experience of salted fish. The consumption frequency of salted fish, lightly salted fish and night-salted fish was also examined, as well as attitudes towards salted fish compared to lightly salted and night-salted fish. The survey was conducted in May 2019 and was published by 17,000 Facebook users, 18 years and older. A total of 505 people completed the survey.

There was a big difference in the participants' answers according to age. The results show that consumption of both fish and salted fish decreases with decreasing age. Only about 29% participants aged 18-29 eat salted fish once a year or more often than the corresponding proportion for the oldest group, 60-70 years, is about 94%. The main reason why participants do not eat salted fish is that they do not like it. Other reasons are that it is too salty, lack of supply, that there is little tradition for salted fish, and that fresh fish is preferred. In general, attitudes towards salted fish were quite positive and the experience of those who have bought salted fish in a restaurant, fish shop and grocery store was good. However, younger participants are generally more negative about salted fish and more likely to find the taste of salted fish bad than older ones. Knowledge and interest in salted fish also decreases with decreasing age, and the same applies to the purchase frequency of salted fish, lightly salted fish and night-salted fish. The results indicate that the taste of salted fish varies according to age. Older participants are more likely to want salted fish well salted and find it less salty than younger ones.

Saltfish has been intertwined with Icelandic history and food culture for centuries. The results of this survey, however, show declining knowledge, interest and consumption of salted fish in younger age groups. This development can be explained by an increased selection of foods, changed tastes, attitudes and habits. It is likely that the image of salted fish as a quality product will be affected and that great changes are taking place in the consumption of salted fish among Icelanders. In order to promote the consumption of salted fish, it needs to be better promoted and made more visible, not least among younger age groups, whether in canteens, supermarkets, fishmongers or restaurants.

View report

Reports

Attitudes and buying behavior of Icelandic consumers of horsemeat

Published:

01/04/2019

Authors:

Eva Margrét Jónudóttir, Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Guðjón Þorkelsson

Supported by:

Agricultural Productivity Fund

Contact

Eva Margrét Jónudóttir

Project Manager

evamargret@matis.is

Attitudes and buying behavior of Icelandic consumers of horsemeat

The aim of this study was to submit proposals to improve the position of horsemeat in the domestic market. A quantitative research method analyzed the attitudes and purchasing behavior of Icelandic consumers (n = 853) of horsemeat. The results were, among other things, that horse and foal meat is not prominent enough and visible in stores all over the country. Most people who buy horse and / or foal meat buy it from the refrigerator or about 50% participants, but the next most common is that people get the meat from friends, relatives, slaughter it themselves, buy it directly from a farm or more. More often than not, people made little distinction between attitudes towards horsemeat on the one hand and foal meat on the other. In terms of willingness to buy products, most said they were less likely to buy minced or smoked horsemeat, but most likely to buy steaks, goldfish and schnitzel. In the opinion of the participants in the study, habits and upbringing have the greatest effect on the consumption of horse and foal meat, followed by knowledge of the product. There are many opportunities in the sale of horsemeat. Most of those who took part in the study were really positive and welcomed the discussion about horsemeat. 96% of the participants had tasted horse and / or foal meat but those who had not tasted were not interested, either because they did not eat meat over their heads or because they felt like eating their dog and considered it wrong because of emotions. Superstitions and prejudices against the consumption of horsemeat seem to have passed long ago, but the public's knowledge of the quality and treatment of horsemeat could be increased. Most people considered horsemeat and foal meat to be a clean and environmentally friendly food, free of antibiotics and contaminants. All that can be said is that there are opportunities for marketing horsemeat and it can be assumed that with many trumps in hand, a big hit can be won if the cards are held correctly.

The aim of this study was to improve the status of horse meat on the Icelandic market. A quantitative research method was used to study the attitudes and buying behavior of Icelandic consumers on horse meat (n = 853). The results showed that horse and foal meat is not prominent and visible in stores in Iceland. Most people who buy horse and / or foal meat buy it from stores, refrigerated, or about 50% of the participants, but most often people get the meat from friends, relatives, slaughter themselves or buy directly from farms. Attitudes towards horse meat and foal meat were generally similar. In terms of buying a product, most people were the least likely to buy a buried or smoked horse meat, but most likely to buy steaks, guillemots and chips. The respondents believed that habits and upbringing had the most effect on horse and foal meat consumption, but knowledge of the product was in the third place. There are many opportunities in the sale of horse meat provided for quality products. Most of the participants were positive towards horse meat and welcomed the discussion on horse meat. 96% of the participants in the survey had tasted horse and / or foal meat. Those who had not tasted the meat, had no interest, either because they did not eat meat or because they felt like eating their dog and felt it was wrong because of emotions. Pastoralism and prejudice towards horse meat appear to belong to the past, but there is room for improvement of consumer knowledge of quality and treatment of horse meat. Most people considered the horse and foal meat to be clean and environmentally friendly food, free of antibiotics and contaminants. The marketing possibilities for horse meat are good.

View report

Reports

Food and sustainable tourism. Summary.

Published:

01/04/2014

Authors:

Þóra Valsdóttir, Guðjón Þorkelsson

Supported by:

Technology Development Fund

Contact

Þóra Valsdóttir

Project Manager

thora.valsdottir@matis.is

Food and sustainable tourism. Summary.

Food and sustainable tourism was a priority and cluster project to promote environmentally friendly food production and food processing in connection with tourism. The project was carried out by public bodies in the business support system, regional development associations and the University of Iceland. The project was carried out in response to a great deal of interest in local food and the environment in connection with the growing activities in tourism. The emphasis was on supporting entrepreneurs in the development of new products and sales channels that benefit tourism in each area. The innovation segment was successful and had a multiplier effect both domestically, nationally and internationally. At the same time, important research was conducted on sustainability criteria, consumer attitudes and quality and shelf life. The communication and communication part of the project was no less important. This report briefly describes the progress of the project and the main conclusions.

Food and Sustainable Tourism was a 3 year collaboration project between academia, R&D institutions and regional development agencies. In the project focus was put on strengthening small scale local food production to encourage sustainability in tourism. The project was executed as a response to rise in interest in local food and environmental issues within tourism. Focus was put on supporting entrepreneurs developing new products and sales channels. Research on sustainability indicators, consumer attitudes and product quality was carried out. 

View report

Reports

Consumer's evaluation of enriched seafood product concepts / Consumer survey of enriched seafood dishes

Published:

01/03/2013

Authors:

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Kyösti Pennanen, Raija ‐ Liisa Heiniö, Rósa Jónsdóttir, Emilía Martinsdóttir

Supported by:

Nordic Innovation

Contact

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Project Manager

kolbrun.sveinsdottir@matis.is

Consumer's evaluation of enriched seafood product concepts / Consumer survey of enriched seafood dishes

Compared to consumers elsewhere in the West, consumers in Europe seem to be more skeptical about food enrichment, and although food health claims carry a message of health effects, they do not necessarily make the product more attractive to consumers. Therefore, the development of enriched foods requires an understanding of consumer demands. An online survey was conducted to evaluate consumers' responses to product ideas on seafood that had been enriched with omega-3, fish proteins and algae, with different information on possible effects and functional properties. Icelandic consumers (n = 460) evaluated ideas for cod products and the results showed that enrichment of such seafood was a viable option, especially with omega-3. Although information on enrichment had a rather negative effect on people's experience of product ideas, information on ingredients and health effects of consumption had a positive effect on people's experience and the likelihood of buying the products in question. The impact of such information was somewhat greater among those consumers who placed more emphasis on health and had a positive attitude towards targeted foods. Finnish consumers (n = 432) evaluated ideas for salmon products and the results showed that the enrichment of seafood with kelp was one of the best results, especially when information on the reduction of salt content was included. From the results, it can be concluded that the enrichment of seafood is a realistic option. However, it is very important to consider the labels and information to consumers about such products.

Compared to consumers elsewhere in the Western world, European consumers generally seem to be more suspicious towards enrichment of food. Although health claims in food products communicate the health effect, it does not necessarily make the products more appealing to consumers. Therefore, development of enriched foods requires understanding of consumers' demands. The aim of this study was to measure consumer responses towards various concepts of enriched seafood products. Web ‐ based questionnaires were used to study Icelandic and Finnish consumers' responses towards concepts of convenience seafood products enriched with omega ‐ 3, fish proteins and seaweed extracts with different information about possible effects / functional properties. Icelandic consumers (n = 460) evaluated cod product concepts and the results showed that enrichment of convenience seafood was a realistic option, especially with omega ‐ 3. Although information about enrichment had rather negative effects, information about ingredients and health effects positively affected product perception and buying intention. The effect of information was greater among consumers which placed higher emphasis on health and expressed more positive attitudes towards functional foods. Two sets of Finnish consumers (n = 432) evaluated nine salmon product concepts. The results showed that products enriched with seaweed received relatively the highest scores, especially when information about salt reduction was provided. To conclude, enrichment of convenience seafood products with marine based ingredients is a realistic option. However, it is very important to consider labeling and information provided to the consumers.

View report

Reports

Enriched seafood

Published:

01/04/2012

Authors:

Emilia Martinsdóttir, Rósa Jónsdóttir, Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Margrét Geirsdóttir, Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Helga Helgadóttir, Gísli M. Gíslason

Supported by:

AVS

Contact

Rósa Jónsdóttir

Research Group Leader

rosa.jonsdottir@matis.is

Enriched seafood

The project Enriched Seafood, which was carried out in collaboration with the company Grím kokk in the Westman Islands and Iceprotein in Sauðárkrókur, is now being completed. There, several prototypes of products from Icelandic seafood were developed and added to them, such as algae concentrate with defined bioactivity, hydrolysates to increase protein content and fish oil to increase omega-3 fatty acids. The results show that it is possible to increase the amount of omega-3 fatty acids in fish balls without compromising the taste quality. The same can be said about the addition of algae powder and also succeeded in increasing the amount of protein in the fish balls. Consumer surveys were conducted to examine consumers' tastes for prototypes compared to traditional products already on the market. Information on the bioactive substances and their activity influenced how people liked the products. The effect of the information depended on various factors, such as attitudes towards health and food and attitudes towards the ingredients of the product tested. An online consumer survey of more than 500 people showed that people are generally more positive about enrichment in the case of known health products such as omega-3. It is also better to provide information on effectiveness even if it is a known substance, as it enhances people's positive experience of the product. Enrichment with kelp also seems to be a viable option as information on the use value of kelp in the product was given and the same can be said regarding fish protein. These products generally appeal more to people who focus on food hygiene, which is a fairly large group according to these findings. In general, it can be concluded from these results that the enrichment of seafood is a realistic possibility, but labeling and information to consumers must be considered. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the enrichment of seafood is a realistic possibility, but labeling and information to consumers must be considered.

Prototypes of seafood dishes enriched with bioactive compounds from the ocean, such as seaweed, fish proteins and fish oil to increase omega-3 fatty acids have been developed to meet market demand. The results show that it is possible to increase the content of omega ‐ 3 fatty acids in fishcakes without negatively affecting the flavor. Also the enrichment of seaweed and fish proteins to increase protein content was successful. Consumers were asked about liking of various prototypes compared to traditional fish dishes. Information on the added compounds and their bio ‐ activity affected the liking of the consumers. Influence of information depended on various factors like attitudes towards health, food and the added ingredients. Web ‐ based consumer survey (500 respondents) showed that consumers were more positive towards enrichment of seafood if well ‐ known ingredients like omega ‐ 3 were used. The information on health ‐ effect and bio ‐ activity was also positive regarding the consumer experience. even though the ingredients were well ‐ known. Enrichment using seaweed or proteins also seems to be a realistic option based on information of the health effect given. These kinds of products appeal more to consumers emphasizing health benefits of their food. It can be stated from the results of the project that enrichment of seafood is a realistic option but labeling and information to consumers is important.

Report closed until 01.04.2015

View report

Reports

Attitudes and fish consumption in Iceland 2011

Published:

01/12/2011

Authors:

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Dagný Yrsa Eyþórsdóttir, Gunnþórunn Einarsdóttir, Emilia Martinsdóttir

Supported by:

Student Innovation Fund, Rannís

Contact

Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir

Project Manager

kolbrun.sveinsdottir@matis.is

Attitudes and fish consumption in Iceland 2011

The aim of the study was to examine consumption habits and attitudes related to seafood among Icelanders aged 18-80. A survey was set up online and letters were sent to a sample from Statistics Iceland in June 2011 and responses were received from 525 people. The aim was also to examine the changes that have taken place in Icelanders' attitudes and fish consumption since the last figures were published in 2006 for people aged 18-26. Attitudes and consumption of Icelanders were analyzed by gender, age, place of residence, education, monthly household income before tax, number in the household and number of children under 18 in the household. On average, Icelanders eat fish as a main course about twice a week. Haddock is the most popular species on the tables of the people and is consumed about once a week, followed by cod. On average, Icelanders take fish oil about four times a week, but in total about half of Icelanders take fish oil daily and 62% three times a week or more. In general, Icelanders seem to eat fresh but frozen fish more often and very little is bought from prepared fish dishes chilled or frozen. Attitudes towards eating fish are generally very positive and the vast majority consider fish healthy and good. Most people believe that family has the most encouraging effect on fish consumption and that a wider budget, easier access to fresh fish and a wider range of fish could have an effect on increased fish consumption. There is a big difference between fish consumption and the attitudes of men and women. Women prefer to buy food and place more emphasis on hygiene, freshness, accessibility and price. They are also of the opinion that it is expensive to eat fish. There was a significant difference between age groups, both in terms of total fish consumption frequency, consumption of different fish products and attitudes. Fish consumption increases with age, as does fish oil consumption. The emphasis on hygiene is lower among younger people. There was a difference in the consumption behavior and consumption of different fish species and products according to residence, which can probably be largely explained by traditions and different supply of fish. Most people, especially those in the older age group, find it rather expensive to eat fish. On the other hand, they find fish more valuable than younger ones. However, it seems that the youngest group is even willing to pay more for fish, as they are of the opinion that a wider range of ready-made fish dishes and fish dishes in restaurants could have an effect on increased fish consumption. Positive changes have taken place in fish consumption and attitudes of people aged 18-26 in the last five years. This group is now more in favor of fish and the frequency of fish consumption has increased somewhat, which is mainly explained by increased fish consumption outside the home. Consumption of fish oil and diversity in the choice of seafood seems to have increased. In this age group, there has been an increase in the consumption of fresh fish, sushi, salted fish and chilled semi-prepared dishes.

The aim of the study was to investigate seafood consumption and attitudes among 18‐80 year old Icelanders. A total of 525 people completed a web-based survey. The aim was also to study changes in attitudes and fish consumption in the last five years among people 18-26 years. The data were analyzed by gender, age, residence, education, income, number of household members and number of children below 18 years. On average, the fish consumption frequency (fish as main course) is around two times a week. Haddock is the most frequently consumed fish species and is consumed around one time per week. Fish oil is consumed four times a week on average, but 50% of the participants consume fish oil every day. Fresh fish is more frequently consumed than frozen fish and ready fish meals, chilled or frozen, are rarely bought. Attitudes towards consuming fish are generally very positive. Most people consider family to have the most encouraging influence on their fish consumption and that less stringent finances, easier access to fresh fish and more variety of fish could positively influence their fish consumption. Fish consumption pattern and attitudes differ by gender. Women more frequently purchase food and emphasize more healthy food, freshness, access and price. Large differences were found between different age groups, both regarding fish consumption frequency, fish products and attitudes. Fish consumption and fish oil consumption frequency increase with age. Emphasis on healthy food are less among younger people. Consumption habits and consumption of different fish species and products differ by residence around the country. This can largely be explained by different traditions and different fish supply. Most people, especially in older age groups consider it expensive to consume fish. They are, however, more likely to consider fish money worth compared to younger people. The youngest age group appears though to be ready to pay more for fish as their opinion is that more variety of ready fish meals and fish courses at restaurants could positively influence their fish consumption. The last five years, positive changes in fish consumption and attitudes among people 18-26 years have occurred. This group now consumes fish more frequently, the varity in their choice of seafood has increased. The consumption of fresh fish, sushi, salted cod and chilled oven ready fish meals has increased among this group.

View report

Reports

Product development of healthier processed meat products

Published:

01/08/2009

Authors:

Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Ólafur Reykdal, Óli Þór Hilmarsson, Gunnþórunn Einarsdóttir, Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir, Þóra Valsdóttir, Emilia Martinsdóttir, Guðjón Þorkelsson

Supported by:

Technology Development Fund, Agricultural Productivity Fund

Contact

Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir

Sensory evaluation manager

adalheiduro@matis.is

Product development of healthier processed meat products

The goal of the "Healthy Meat Products" project was to develop healthier ready-made meat products with less salt and hard fats. In the product development process, sensory evaluation was used to assess the sensory quality of the products and consumer surveys to check how consumers liked the product. Consumer surveys were conducted both at home and at work. The results of sensory evaluation and consumer surveys were used to decide on changes in the production process to adapt the products to consumer tastes. Microbial and chemical measurements were performed to monitor the shelf life and chemical content of the products. Consumption habits of processed meat products and attitudes towards low-fat and low-salt meat products were studied. The project succeeded in producing fat- and salt-reduced products from three product categories: new meat products, pre-fried meat products and cold cuts. One of those products is now ready for the market. The new product received very good reviews from consumers and even better than the product that was on the market. The other two products have come a long way in product development and the company now has the knowledge and experience to complete that product development and continue with the development of such products. Consumers are generally positive about fat reduction in meat products. However, there is a difference in their answers depending on which product is involved and there is also a difference between the sexes. The vast majority consider low-fat meat products to be healthier than products with a traditional fat content. For consumers, the most important thing is that the product is tasty. Price is also important, but less so. Consumers often make the same quality demands on low-fat and traditional products. Consumers care about the hygiene of meat products but are not willing to replace the taste quality with hygiene. There was a difference in the attitudes of men and women. Women think more about healthy food than men and are more positive about low-fat meat products. They are also more likely to buy low-fat meat products. Women rather than men check whether the product is environmentally friendly. Package information is important. About two-thirds of consumers say they look at fat content when choosing meat products. About half of consumers look at the amount of salt, so it seems that most people care less about the amount of fat. Care must be taken with the labeling and content description of salt and low-fat meat products, as this affects consumers' choices and expectations.

The aim of the project was to develop healthier processed meat products with lower salt and fat content. In the production development process, the sensory attributes of the prototypes were evaluated by a trained sensory panel. Consumer tests were conducted to study the consumer liking of the products. The consumer tests were done in different settings as central location tests and in-home tests. The results from the sensory evaluation and the consumer test were used to make decisions on the next steps in the product development. Microbiological and chemical analysis was performed to estimate the storage life and nutritional status of the products. The consumption pattern and consumer attitudes towards processed meat products with reduced fat- and salt content were studied. In the project the product development of three products in different product categories was successful. One of the products is ready for marketing and consumer tests indicated better liking of this new prototype than of the traditional one. The two other products need further development and the company now has the competence and experience to finalize the development. Consumers are generally in favor of fat-reduced meat products but there is a gender difference and a difference towards different product categories. Most of the consumers believe that fat-reducing meat products are healthier than traditional products. The taste is most important to most consumers and the price is also important. The consumers make the same demands to quality of fat-reduced food as other food. Consumers find the healthiness of food important, but not as important as the taste. Women are more aware of the healthiness of food and they are more positive towards fat-reduce meat products. They are more likely to buy fat reduced food and more aware of environmentally friendly food. The information on the packaging is important. Two thirds of consumers look for the fat content on the food label of the product they buy, but only half of them look at the salt content. Labeling and packaging information is very important as it affects the choice and expectations of the consumers.

Report closed until 01-10-2012

View report
EN
IS EN